- From: Cyril Concolato <cyril.concolato@enst.fr>
- Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:38:32 +0200
- To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- CC: www-svg@w3.org
Hi Doug, Doug Schepers a écrit : > Hi, Cyril- > > Cyril Concolato wrote (on 10/13/08 7:03 AM): >> * section 5.2 The 'g' element >> In general, the way "attribute definitions" are given is confusing. For >> example, if one does not understand RNG (and dig into all RNG snippets), >> it will think the g element only has the focusable attribute and the >> navigation attributes > > We have element and attribute tables that are more comprehensive, and in > order to make it more obvious, I have written a small overview of how to > use the specification. [1] > > In future specifications, we intend to pay more attention to the > organization and design of the specification, to make it more intuitive > to use. One such improvement is to add the attribute and element tables > inline in the definitions, in SVG 2.0 Core. > > >> Also, the general syntax sometimes is confusing: for example: >> preserveAspectRatio = "[defer] <align> [<meet>]" should rather be >> something like: >> preserveAspectRatio = ["defer"] <align> [<meet>] >> There are several examples in this case. > > The SVG WG agrees that there are some inconsistencies in the way values > are formatted, and we will continue correcting them as we find them. > > In this instance, I have corrected the example you point out. > > Please let us know promptly if this satisfies your comment. Thank you. This satisfies my comment. Cyril -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group Département Traitement du Signal et Images /Dept. Signal and Image Processing Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Télécommunications 46 rue Barrault 75 013 Paris, France http://tsi.enst.fr/~concolat
Received on Thursday, 16 October 2008 07:39:12 UTC