Re: [1.2T-LC] Comments on Last Call WD of SVG T1.2 (ISSUE-2132)

Hi Doug,

Doug Schepers a écrit :
> Hi, Cyril-
> 
> Cyril Concolato wrote (on 10/13/08 7:03 AM):
>> * section 5.2 The 'g' element
>> In general, the way "attribute definitions" are given is confusing. For
>> example, if one does not understand RNG (and dig into all RNG snippets),
>> it will think the g element only has the focusable attribute and the
>> navigation attributes
> 
> We have element and attribute tables that are more comprehensive, and in
> order to make it more obvious, I have written a small overview of how to
> use the specification. [1]
> 
> In future specifications, we intend to pay more attention to the
> organization and design of the specification, to make it more intuitive
> to use.  One such improvement is to add the attribute and element tables
> inline in the definitions, in SVG 2.0 Core.
> 
> 
>> Also, the general syntax sometimes is confusing:  for example:
>> preserveAspectRatio = "[defer] <align> [<meet>]"  should rather be
>> something like:
>> preserveAspectRatio = ["defer"] <align> [<meet>]
>> There are several examples in this case.
> 
> The SVG WG agrees that there are some inconsistencies in the way values
> are formatted, and we will continue correcting them as we find them.
> 
> In this instance, I have corrected the example you point out.
> 
> Please let us know promptly if this satisfies your comment.
Thank you. This satisfies my comment.

Cyril

-- 
Cyril Concolato
Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor
Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group
Département Traitement du Signal et Images
/Dept. Signal and Image Processing
Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Télécommunications
46 rue Barrault
75 013 Paris, France
http://tsi.enst.fr/~concolat 

Received on Thursday, 16 October 2008 07:39:12 UTC