- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:47:47 -0400
- To: cyril.concolato@telecom-paristech.fr
- CC: www-svg@w3.org
Hi, Cyril- Cyril Concolato wrote (on 10/13/08 7:03 AM): > > * section 5.2 The 'g' element > In general, the way "attribute definitions" are given is confusing. For > example, if one does not understand RNG (and dig into all RNG snippets), > it will think the g element only has the focusable attribute and the > navigation attributes We have element and attribute tables that are more comprehensive, and in order to make it more obvious, I have written a small overview of how to use the specification. [1] In future specifications, we intend to pay more attention to the organization and design of the specification, to make it more intuitive to use. One such improvement is to add the attribute and element tables inline in the definitions, in SVG 2.0 Core. > Also, the general syntax sometimes is confusing: for example: > preserveAspectRatio = "[defer] <align> [<meet>]" should rather be > something like: > preserveAspectRatio = ["defer"] <align> [<meet>] > There are several examples in this case. The SVG WG agrees that there are some inconsistencies in the way values are formatted, and we will continue correcting them as we find them. In this instance, I have corrected the example you point out. Please let us know promptly if this satisfies your comment. [1] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/publish/intro.html#howtouse Regards- -Doug
Received on Thursday, 16 October 2008 04:47:57 UTC