- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:39:58 +0200
- To: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: Erik Dahlström <ed@opera.com>, www-svg@w3.org
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:05:39 +0200, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:00:29 +0200, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> >> wrote: >>> What if it has fill="url(foo.svg#bar)", though? Per SVG 1.1 that's >>> suddenly a non-local reference, right? Should that fill be rendered? > > This is the real question. I agree that url(foo.svg#bar) should be a same-document reference if the document is foo.svg and there's no base URI messing things up. I was just making a point about one of the implications you pointed out. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 14 October 2008 13:41:05 UTC