- From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 12:15:40 +1200
- To: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <11e306600805261715i17ab55e5m5c1ec0f2afb21fe3@mail.gmail.com>
http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/coords.html#ObjectBoundingBox says > If percentages are used within the content of a 'pattern'<http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/pservers.html#PatternElement>, > 'clipPath' <http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/masking.html#ClipPathElement>, 'mask'<http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/masking.html#MaskElement>or > 'filter' <http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/filters.html#FilterElement> element, > these values are treated according to the processing rules for percentages > as defined in Units <http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/coords.html#Units>. > This seems counter-intuitive. E.g. <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"> <defs> <clipPath id="r" clipPathUnits="objectBoundingBox"> <rect width="10%" height="10%"/> </clipPath> </defs> <rect width="500" height="500" fill="lime" clip-path="url(#r)"/> </svg> Seems authors would expect the clip to be 10% of the object. But instead, 10% is interpreted relative to the viewport, so it's likely to be 10% of 1000 or thereabouts. But clipPath coordinates are expected to be in the range (0,0)-(1,1), so nothing is clipped out. So "percentage of the viewport" is pretty much useless for objectBoundingBox coordinates. Can anyone explain why it was specced this way? Rob -- "He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah 53:5-6]
Received on Tuesday, 27 May 2008 00:16:20 UTC