W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > June 2008

Re: "liveness" of SVGMatrix

From: Anthony Grasso <anthony.grasso@cisra.canon.com.au>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:14:29 +1000
Message-ID: <486879C5.5030605@cisra.canon.com.au>
To: robert@ocallahan.org
CC: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>

Hi Robert,

There was an errata [1] about live values for SVG Full 1.1. Please check 
the link. I'm not sure if the link completely answer your question though.

Please let me know.



[1] http://www.w3.org/2003/01/REC-SVG11-20030114-errata#mention-live-values

Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> Four years ago there was a thread about whether an SVGMatrix passed to 
> SVGTransform::setMatrix is "live", i.e. whether subsequent changes to 
> that matrix object affect the transform. The thread started here.
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2004Jun/0016.html
> There was followup discussion in this Bugzilla bug:
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=249263
> where people explained some use cases for having the matrix be "live".
> As far as I can tell the 1.1 spec has still not been clarified to 
> indicate whether the matrix is live or not. Please come to a decision 
> and issue a spec update to indicate whether it's live or not.
> Thanks,
> Rob
> -- 
> "He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our 
> iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by 
> his wounds we are healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of 
> us has turned to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity 
> of us all." [Isaiah 53:5-6]
Received on Monday, 30 June 2008 06:15:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:54:18 UTC