- From: Helder Magalhães <helder.magalhaes@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:20:12 +0100
- To: "Doug Schepers" <schepers@w3.org>
- Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
> First, let me thank you for your research and thoughtful comments. However, > I think you are conflating the wording in SVG 1.1 with the new proposed > wording. SVG 1.1 is simply unclear, and doesn't provide for all the use > cases. Consider the proposed wording to supersede the wording in SVG 1.1. [...] > I'm a little confused. Is there something wrong with the proposed wording, > such that it doesn't satisfy some of these requirements? Sorry, I seem to have missed a link. When I drafted my response I only read the mailing list thread [1] and wasn't aware of the link for the current wording [2] stated afterward. Yes, the current wording seems to make things much more clear. :-) Best regards, Helder Magalhães [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008JulSep/0091.html [2] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/master/linking.html#unresolved-resources
Received on Tuesday, 29 July 2008 11:20:49 UTC