- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:52:38 -0500
- To: ~:'' ありがとうございました。 <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
Hi, Jonathan- ~:'' ありがとうございました。 wrote (on 1/21/08 4:40 AM): > > well I loved the apparent overt simplicity of the Acid2 test. > ie at least when launched any mortal could see if something was amiss. While Acid3 is not as cute as Acid2, it's still clear when a browser renders it correctly... just see the reference image, which is how it should look. [1] > I'd prefer something less overtly technical and 'standards' in your face. > something amusing that appealed to a wider audience, raising the > popularity of SVG. > A short story perhaps. There is a place for such promotional images, but the Acid tests are meant to promote interoperability, especially in edge cases. There's a place for both kinds of tests (as well as individual implementability tests). > It seems the test halts, could it not be designed to complete sections > and continue in any case? > > Could accessibility tests to be included, including mousewheel, keyboard > etc. > > xmlhttprequest and more.... > > on this basis Acid 3 appears to fail to live up to Acid 2. > it's not amusing, nut none the less a significant development. > > Might a short youtube animation be helpful in determining errors and > generating interest. Like Jeff said, the SVG WG has little say in how the test is designed; you'll have to talk to Ian Hickson. But we are interested in feedback on SVG-specific tests. [1] http://hixie.ch/tests/evil/acid/003/reference.html Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG, CDF, and WebAPI
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2008 01:52:47 UTC