- From: Erik Dahlström <ed@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:11:55 +0100
- To: "Jeff Schiller" <codedread@gmail.com>, "David Woolley" <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>, j.chetwynd@btinternet.com, www-svg@w3.org
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:42:14 +0100, Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com> wrote: > > I do agree that SVGs displayed directly in the article would be a good > thing eventually. However, I think I agree with the decision not to > turn on SVG natively directly inside articles, their server-side > rasterization saves client-side time/headaches: > > 1) rendering SVG is more expensive than rendering PNG (until vector > graphic hardware acceleration gets to the desktop) There are always cases where that isn't true, and it depends on if you count time it might take to transfer the files. > 2) there are still differences between the quality of renderings > between the three major browsers supporting it (animation only > supported in one atm) Do you have any particular examples that shows the quality differences? > 3) means of displaying SVGs in IE remain sketchy (unsupported plugin > from Adobe, the silent Renesis folks) It's entirely possible to have fallback content. > 4) stripping potentially maliscious code is not as simple as stripping > script tags > > Plus, you can get to the native SVG just by clicking through a couple > links (from article to image, from image to SVG link): > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svg -> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Bitmap_VS_SVG.svg (raster shown > despite the confusing URL) -> > http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6b/Bitmap_VS_SVG.svg > (actual SVG rendered directly in most browsers) > > Also I had a question - does MediaWiki (the software that Wikipedia > runs on) support displaying SVGs on the client side inside articles? > I know I should probably ask this question elsewhere, but I was just > curious. I was actually trying out some mediawiki svg hacks like that a while back. I have to say though, I wouldn't like to have SVG (or arbitrary HTML for that matter) enabled without stripping away the scripts if I was running a wiki. And I agree with you Jeff, it may not even be that simple if you want to be on the safe side. Cheers /Erik -- Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2008 16:12:19 UTC