- From: Anthony Grasso <anthony.grasso@cisra.canon.com.au>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:40:52 +1100
- To: Kalle Raita <kraita@nvidia.com>
- CC: www-svg@w3.org
Hi Kalle, This is the official response from the SVG WG. Thank you for pointing out the fixes required to the SVG Tiny 1.2 Test Suite. Your email prompted me to go through all the tests in the Tiny 1.2 Test Suite and fix any positional attributes on <tspan> elements. The following tests have been fixed: fonts-glyph-201-t fonts-glyph-202-t struct-common-201-t struct-common-201-t-debug text-align-203-t (replaced text-align-03-t) text-fonts-202-t text-fonts-203-t udom-dom-210-t udom-event-202-t udom-event-203-t udom-event-204-t udom-event-205-t udom-event-207-t udom-event-208-t udom-event-209-t udom-smil-202-t These fixes will appear in the next release of the SVG Tiny 1.2 Test Suite. Thank you again for your feedback. Kind Regards, Anthony Grasso Software Engineer Canon Information Systems Research Australia Phone: +61 2 8873 8821 Email: anthony.grasso@cisra.canon.com.au Kalle Raita wrote: > Hi, > > The spec says that tspan element cannot be have positional attributes: > > 10.5 The 'tspan' element: > ... Positional attributes such as x, y, dx, dy and rotate are not > available on 'tspan' in SVG Tiny 1.2. > > However, following cases have tspan elements that use positional > attributes. > fonts-glyph-201-t > text-fonts-202-t > udom-dom-210-t > udom-event-202-t > udom-event-203-t > udom-event-204-t > udom-event-207-t > udom-smil-202-t > > Yours, > - Kalle > > Kalle Raita > NVIDIA Corporation > Tel. +358 40 723 1441 > kraita@nvidia.com > http://eu.nvidia.com <http://eu.nvidia.com/> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain > confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution > is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by > reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >
Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2008 22:41:12 UTC