- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:37:48 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Cameron McCormack wrote: > > That should be treated just like multiple-character glyphs (like > ligatures), i.e. getStartPositionOfChar(firstSurrogate) == > getStartPositionOfChar(secondSurrogate), and same for > getEndPositionOfChar(). Ah, ok, cool. Glad to know there's precedent, too (with the ligatures stuff). I've updated the test. You may wish to examine it to make sure it is still correct, since you wrote it. :-) > > Is there an errata I can look at? > > http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Group/repository/errata/errata.xml#svgtextcontentelement-getnumberofchars Awesome, thanks. Please let me know when you have text for the other methods too, so I can check the test is consistent with those. Please do make these errata public as soon as possible; testing things that aren't even in a spec yet, let alone an errata that came out after the test, is not something I would like to make a habbit of. :-) Cheers, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 15 February 2008 01:38:01 UTC