- From: Jonathan Chetwynd <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 11:34:03 +0100
- To: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <556E3B77-CA78-4C52-A437-87B3724A95E6@btinternet.com>
David, would a stock-ticker from your stockbrocker better suit the sensibilities of this list? one that easily pastes into a personal page of stocks. now it is commercially important to know whether the graph/image/ number is static or active. was this the latest price, or an old one? the email aspect is a side issue, but does currently represent an easy to understand model for exchange. - see Durkheim on gifts. regards Jonathan Chetwynd j.chetwynd@btinternet.com http://www.openicon.org/ +44 (0) 20 7978 1764 On 29 Jul 2008, at 23:13, David Woolley wrote: > > Jonathan Chetwynd wrote: >> My wife and daughter are off to Australia to see the family. >> an email with a 'live' weather icon for the current weather would >> be useful. >> less busy and easier to find than a link. > > I don't find the argument convincing. When one writes, it is the > personal experiences that makes the things personal. A mechanically > generated forecast from some time after the message was written > seems rather impersonal, and, if the weather has changed greatly, > may conflict with the tone of the message. > > However, having looked at the SVG, and ignoring intellectual > property issues, I was reminded of one of the earlier side issues in > this thread, caching. It seems to me that one either wants to make > the dynamic variant a completely different URL, or to have the main, > atatic, file, "use" a small file with the dynamic content, which > then selects and uses an icon from the first file. > > On both this, and the marking of volatile content, I can't really > see that there are any new requirements on SVG. > > -- > David Woolley > Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. > RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, > that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work. >
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2008 10:34:49 UTC