- From: Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 13:46:06 +0100
- To: www-svg@w3.org
To be sure, this is not lost in the last month, just my interpretation: The definition of the marker property: 'marker' Value: see individual properties And for the individual properties: 'marker-start', 'marker-end', marker-mid' Value: none | inherit | <uri> This results in 'marker' Value: none | inherit | <uri> And about <uri>: http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/struct.html#uriReferenceDefinition Therefore 'marker', 'marker-start', 'marker-end', marker-mid' do only have a single value, no list and no fallback semantics as for example available for <paint>. To resume, marker: url(#marker1); looks for me correct too and marker: url(#marker1) url(#marker1) url(#marker1); looks wrong; this would be ok too: marker-start: url(#marker1); marker-mid: url(#marker1); marker-end:url(#marker1); And: there is no presentation attribute for 'marker' in the DTD, only for 'marker-start', 'marker-end', marker-mid', therefore 'marker' can be only used with the CSS notation.
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2008 12:54:53 UTC