- From: Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 13:36:27 +0100
- To: www-svg@w3.org
Just some ideas: Small details can dramatically change the meaning of a text too. Sometimes one or two changed or missing glyphs may change the meaning of a paragraph or a section of text completely, therefore fonts have typically a missing glyph to indicate such a problem. For example older versions of Opera (8, 9.0 etc) provided some indication of a missing image, this typically appeared if an SVG document was referenced with an image element and this was not yet implemented. This seems to be quite similar to a wrong IRI situation for the user. 'HTML5' seems to be the approach to hide any error of the author by doing something without informing the user about the problem. It is a matter of taste in general, if this is considered to be a useful behaviour a) for authors b) for users of erroneous documents. However it is no problem, if the author checks the document and avoids errors in general (does really any author check any document/script-output independently? Obviously the availability of external referenced documents is not always under the control of the author. This is a further complication of this simple model again. But in such a case the user-agent typically receives another information or no information from the server as in a case without a document for the related IRI.
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2008 12:46:28 UTC