- From: Anthony Grasso <anthony.grasso@cisra.canon.com.au>
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 10:28:39 +1000
- To: Tim Rowley <tor@acm.org>
- CC: www-svg@w3.org
Hi Tim, This is the official response from the SVG WG. As you may know the SVG WG has recently released an updated version of the SVG Full 1.1 Errata [1]. I am pleased to announce that this version of the Errata has proposed wording for the issue you raised on the undefined behavior of missing feFunc[RGBA] in feComponentTransfer [2]. We hope this proposed errata item addresses your issue. If not, we are happy to consider any other suggestions you may have. Thank you. Kind Regards, Anthony Grasso [1] http://www.w3.org/2003/01/REC-SVG11-20030114-errata [2] http://www.w3.org/2003/01/REC-SVG11-20030114-errata#undefined-behaviour-missing-fefunc
Received on Friday, 26 October 2007 00:28:56 UTC