- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 08:33:42 +0000
- To: www-svg@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5190 ------- Comment #3 from schepers@w3.org 2007-10-13 08:33 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Can I propose the new SW logo as this combines many WG and includes text? > > http://www.w3.org/2007/10/sw-logos.html This is not the place for this conversation. This is not a forum, it's an issue tracker for tracking feature requests and technical issues with the SVG specifications and resources. If you fill it with off-topic material, it will make it harder for everyone (both the public and the SVG WG) to use it to efficiently address open issues. Nevertheless, I've posted a "fixed" version of that logo, with real text supplementing the null-semantic glyph shapes. > regarding caching static image, should the author (optionally?) provide a link > image? is there a tech term for such a thing? I don't think that's necessary or desirable. Rasterizing SVG, if that's what the search engine chooses to do, is trivially easy, and could be done on the fly when indexing. Author-pre-cached images mean more to maintain, and a greater chance of losing sync, and nobody would do it anyway. > please change os to 'all' As I explain in the Feedback page (http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/feedback.html), please ignore Platform and OS... they are meaningless in the context of non-software issues, but Bugzilla is a little clunky.
Received on Saturday, 13 October 2007 08:33:48 UTC