- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:09:16 -0400
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>, public-cdf@w3.org, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Hi, Henri- Henri Sivonen wrote (on 10/12/2007 7:23 AM): > > We don't do inline SVG in text/html yet. Personally, I hope we'll get > there. However, if we do, the main SVG complications will be the xlink > mapping, the /> syntax and SVG-native camelCaps. I don't think it is a > good idea to introduce more complications if we are already entertaining > inline SVG in text/html as a possibility. Thanks for outlining the challenges to integrating SVG into text/html, from an HTML5 standpoint. That's very helpful. I also want that to happen, and would like to facilitate that when the time comes. Also like you, I do have certain concerns about how it's done. I'll give you my viewpoint (which is not necessarily shared by the rest of the SVG or CDF WGs). From a technical and market viewpoint (an odd pairing, perhaps), I feel very strongly that SVG-in-HTML should maintain identical markup syntax with standalone SVG (or SVG-in-XHTML, and probably X/HTML-in-SVG); any differences between the two syntaces would be actively harmful to SVG. For example, someone who copy-pasted an SVG fragment from HTML and tried to use it as a standalone file, or imported it into an SVG file (perhaps in an automated mashup) would get unexpected and probably disastrous results. Those inconsistencies would leave casual authors with a bad impression of SVG, and force advanced authors to make elaborate workarounds. The goal, from the perspective of the SVG WG, would be to make it easier --not harder-- for authors, and to increase the use of SVG (and specifically not to drive authors into the hands of vendors of proprietary formats). I'm not saying that the SVG WG is not willing to consider reasonable compromises, just that the end result of should be a uniform syntax for SVG. From a logistics standpoint, this work should be done in coordination between the HTML, SVG, and CDF Working Groups. All have a vested interest in it, and each has a unique set of perspectives, needs, and knowledge. Perhaps we can begin talking about it at the upcoming Tech Plenary. We are all busy with other things right now, but opening the dialog will prepare us for what we'll need to consider going forward. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Staff Contact, SVG, CDF, and WebAPI
Received on Friday, 12 October 2007 16:09:35 UTC