- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 08:01:41 +0100
- To: SVG List <www-svg@w3.org>
~:'' ありがとうございました。 wrote: > > how is it proposed that the non-developer author aria compliant documents? > I think that will only happen if authoring tools are created that create a strong framework, and even then, unless you remove a lot of the power of the language from users, most such features will require that the author has a reasonably good understanding of language, including good introspection of their own use of language, and the motivation to not take short cuts. Professional authors will probably not want to use such constrained tools, so a business model will need to be created that supports the creation of such tools. As currently the case with all semantic and accessibility features, most professional authors will lack the motivation, and possibly the language introspection, to use them as well, but will not accept the constraints of a tool that requires that you use its control components. The same factors that mean that designers are generating slightly better structured code and slightly more accessible sites, with time, may eventually increase use in this class. Documents will degrade gracefully to non-semantic form, so what will be lost is the gain; one will be in no worse a position than before any user agent support was added, which is a much better situation than relying on the latest popular browser's proprietary presentational features. -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Friday, 5 October 2007 07:02:21 UTC