- From: Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 14:12:19 +0200
- To: www-svg@w3.org
Currently I cannot see a big advantage in the role draft compared to class. A simple attribute cannot really cover the lack of semantics, even if a few values are predefined. It would require a huge list of predefined values for (X)HTML and several additional values for graphics as SVG (for example the (X)HTML elements as values, useful for the textArea element). But of course, if the communities really start to collect useful values to put it into a recommendation, this may work (and there is not much to do for implementors in a first approach as maybe to display the role values similar to the values of the title attribute in (X)HTML, maybe only on demand from the user). What I currently learned, trying to mark up classical and modern poems either with XHTML1.1 (or HTML5) or with SVG, that there is surprisingly almost no semantic advantage in using (X)HTML compared with SVG, because (X)HTML has no semantics for poems, SVG does not have either, but both have a class attribute ;o) This can only be improved with a role attribute, having many predefined values, leaving class with only meaningless values ...
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2007 12:17:29 UTC