W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > October 2007

Public identifiers for SVG 1.1 Tiny and Mobile

From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 18:49:56 +0900
Message-Id: <E6C04936-0353-476C-B65F-455A1C836045@w3.org>
To: www-svg@w3.org


 From the SVGMobile spec, I can't figure out what the PI for SVG 1.1  
Tiny and Basic are.

in http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile/#sec-svgtdtd
      This DTD is identified by the PUBLIC and SYSTEM identifiers:

         PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 1.1 Tiny//EN"
         SYSTEM "http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/1.1/DTD/svg11-tiny.dtd"

<!ENTITY % SVG.version "-//W3C//DTD SVG 1.1 Tiny//EN" >

in http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile/#sec-conformance
       <!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG Tiny 1.1//EN"

ditto for SVG Basic

in http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile/#sec-conformance F.2
       <!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG Basic 1.1//EN"

in http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile/#sec-svgbdtd
      This DTD is identified by the PUBLIC and SYSTEM identifiers:

         PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 1.1 Basic//EN"
         SYSTEM "http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/1.1/DTD/svg11-basic.dtd"
<!ENTITY % SVG.version "-//W3C//DTD SVG 1.1 Basic//EN" >

So, which is it? :)
1.1 Basic or Basic 1.1? 1.1 Tiny or Tiny 1.1?
The problem is, I've seen both in the wild, in the (few) doctype- 
toting SVG mobile docs I could find.

For now I will assume that the correct one is the one in the  
conformance section.

The spec may have to be amended to allow both, but that's not a  
fantastic solution...
And if this is a mistake, I suppose it should be in the errata.

olivier Thereaux - W3C - http://www.w3.org/People/olivier/
W3C Open Source Software: http://www.w3.org/Status
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2007 09:50:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:54:16 UTC