- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:06:15 -0400
- To: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
Hi, www-svg- In an effort to have more transparency into our process, and to better address issues with our specifications, our test suite, our errata, and other documents, we intend to use a public issue tracker, where issues can be filed and the progress followed by implementors, authors, and the general public. To get things rolling, we've added SVG to the list of options for W3C's Bugzilla. We know it's not ideal for issues (being designed for bugs in software), but it can at least serve as a stopgap, and we can learn from it what features we need going forward. You can use it here (registration required): http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/enter_bug.cgi?product=SVG To raise an issue with any of the SVG documents, including the specifications, the errata, or the test suites, simply fill out the form. Make sure to select the following fields (you can ignore Platform and OS): * Version: Profile and Version * Component: Area of the specification * Target Milestone: If you wish to raise an issue about the errata or test suite, indicate it here; otherwise, leave it as the default. This same form can also be used to make feature requests, by selecting that option from Target Milestone (and/or "enhancement" under Severity). Again, apologies for the awkward interface. Obviously, we have our own internal issue tracking, but it's not geared toward the general public. So right now, we're looking into issue-tracker software that would be better suited for this purpose. We are interested in hearing feedback from this list on what software is best suited for this task. The software should be open source, and customizable to fit this task (that of tracking issues on documents, rather than bugs in software). We would like to offer the ability to select specific documents (spec version and chapter, for example), to allow linking to or inclusion of discussion, to incorporate dependencies, and to display the current status of the issue. We're also interested in feedback about what sorts of features you'd like to see in this issue tracker. Obviously, forms that fill themselves out and automagic write-access to the specs themselves would be nice, but we encourage you to err on the side of realism... and if your wishlist comes with a suggestion of a software package to match, so much the better. We realize that some people may not wish to fill in a form to submit issues, so of course we will still be taking email requests and discussion. But we strongly encourage you to work with us on this, as we think everyone will benefit from a more open process. Let us know what you think! Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Staff Contact, SVG, CDF, and WebAPI
Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2007 18:07:46 UTC