- From: Jonathan Chetwynd <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:20:21 +0000
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org, SVG List <www-svg@w3.org>
Boris, I haven't (yet) completed an authoritative analysis of current UA behaviour in this respect. however using a user style sheet: :link, :visited { text-decoration: underline ! important } this worked well with many html pages, however with svg it appears it may not for Opera, Amaya and Camino I wasn't able to enable ie5.2 to accept a user style sheet. I often get things wrong, but if right, it does seem as this is a fairly basic failure to implement a standard. Please bear in mind this is merely one example...... regards Jonathan Chetwynd On 9 Feb 2007, at 09:04, Boris Zbarsky wrote: Jonathan Chetwynd wrote: > it seems clear to me at least from your responses that specificity > is a clear example where the w3c process has not considered users > needs. I'm not quite sure what in my response gave you that idea. I can see where you might have gotten that idea from David's response, but I think his statement was incorrect. If you look at the history of the specificity section, user needs were definitely considered -- this is why user stylesheet !important rules override all author rules. Didn't use to be that way in the early drafts. ;) > from an initial consideration of accessibility, the user being non- > technical needs a simple style sheet that works out of the box > across the web, if it is to be of any use at all. A simple stylesheet that does what? -Boris
Received on Friday, 9 February 2007 14:20:29 UTC