- From: ~:'' ありがとうございました。 <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 13:52:27 +0100
- To: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Cc: SVG List <www-svg@w3.org>
David, are you suggesting that Doug's assertion is without value? regarding your second suggestion, pointer-events is also available, and could be used to meet their needs. cheers Jonathan Chetwynd On 4 Aug 2007, at 12:49, David Woolley wrote: ~:'' ありがとうございました。 wrote: Doug, > please could you provide an example to substantiate your assertion > that: > "there would be no way to achieve certain effects" That appears to be a request to prove the negative, which is generally impossible. Personally, I see no fundamental logic that dictates that your way is better, and I think you are failing to consider that many people might want to disable events before total transparency was achieved -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Saturday, 4 August 2007 12:52:35 UTC