- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2007 03:30:19 -0400
- To: SVG List <www-svg@w3.org>
Hi, Jonathan- ~:'' ありがとうございました。 wrote (on 8/4/2007 2:56 AM): > > I take your points, however it seems to me you may be imagining this > issue from a developer and implementer viewpoint rather than a naive > coder or someone using a design or drawing tool. The perspective of the author, in this instance, is best served by the functionality that's been explained. If the opacity of the element were not independent of the "tangibility" (i.e. pointer-events), there would be no way to achieve certain effects, while the reverse is not true. If we specified it the way you've requested, then authors would be more limited in what they can achieve. As you know, SVG is a rich language, in which there are various different ways of achieving the same or similar effects. I suggest that for the case you're describing, you could get at it another way, perhaps without the need for a mask. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Staff Contact, SVG, CDF, and WebAPI
Received on Saturday, 4 August 2007 07:30:29 UTC