Re: Proposed and draft errata for SVG 1.1 available.

Hi, Robert-

This list is not exhaustive; there are other things we are actively 
working on.  But we appreciate your calling them to attention.  Now that 
we have a published errata document and a process in place to easily 
update it, we can respond to errata or clarification requests with a 

Robert Longson wrote:
> I don't see any clarification of glyph cell, em square and character 
> cell as
> promised in

This is something I'm currently working on.  It had to take a 
back-burner to more pressing matters at my day job, but it's an area of 
specific interest to me, and I'm making time to finish this up.  It 
involves quite a few small but widespread changes.  I will try to have 
it included by end of next week.

(Incidentally, this should have been in the proposed errata section, not 
sure why it wasn't.)

> Nor does the wording change of
> seem to be
> included.

I have made the request to add this to the agenda for the errata. 
Hopefully this one can go in next week as well, since it's pretty simple.

-Doug, sorta on behalf of the SVG WG

Received on Thursday, 5 April 2007 15:33:41 UTC