- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:07:54 -0700
- To: Ola Andersson <Ola.Andersson@ikivo.com>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <C893E5FE-CE3A-4D66-8A83-90608C9BDEF1@apple.com>
On May 11, 2006, at 6:32 AM, Ola Andersson wrote: > Hi Maciej,We added “event” as an alias to “evt”, this way backwards > compatibility is kept and the html universal practice likewise. This addresses my concern. Thanks. Regards, Maciej > Please let us know shortly if this doesn’t address your > concern.Thanks/ola (for the SVG WG) From: Maciej Stachowiak > <mjs@apple.com> > Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 02:02:53 -0700 > Message-Id: <5EA9AE66-2DE0-43C9-9C3A-5400FF860D0E@apple.com> > To: www-svg@w3c.org > > > SVG Tiny 1.2 calls for handler element bodies to implicitly create a > function with a paramater named "evt" for the event. SVG Full 1.1 did > the same for event handler attributes. However, the longstanding > universal practice of (X)HTML UAs is to name this parameter "event". > It seems like it will be terribly confusing in a CDF enviornment for > SVG event handlers to name this parameter "evt" and for other > languages to use "event", especially since many major browsers are > now implementing HTML+SVG. There does not seem to be any advantage to > "evt". > > I recommend renaming this parameter from "evt" to "event". This would > break compatibility with SVG 1.1 but the alternative is ongoing > confusion for content authors. Another option is to require both > "evt" and "event" parameters but deprecate "evt". > > Regards, > Maciej > > >
Received on Thursday, 11 May 2006 16:09:03 UTC