RE: SVG12: "Animation event names"

> From: Bjoern Hoehrmann

> * Dean Jackson wrote:
> > >   In 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-SVGMobile12-20050413/interact.html
> > > section 13.2 the "Animation event name" does not make any 
> sense to 
> > > me.

> > > Please change the draft such that this column is removed 
> and that it 
> > > is clear that animation may use any of the supported events.
> >
> >You've made a similar misunderstanding to a previous message 
> (my reply 
> >to that is [1]).
> 
> Could you approach this from a different angle and explain 
> why it would not make sense to do as I requested?

The model, as documented, has been in use in SVG 1.0.  It has been
implemented many times by many people and has satisfied the needs of the
community for many years.  For these reasons, we do not feel that this
section of the spec needs to be changed as you suggest.

If there is something that isn't clear in the spec, in Dean's response
[1] to your original email, or in this response, please let us know
within 2 weeks.

Regards,
Scott Hayman
On behalf of the SVG WG

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2005Nov/0015.html



---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.

Received on Wednesday, 10 May 2006 08:19:57 UTC