- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:44:53 +0100
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
On Sunday, March 19, 2006, 12:15:08 AM, Bjoern wrote: BH> I therefore think specification of attributeType="XML" should be BH> described as recommended by the specification, and the importance of BH> doing so be highlighted. Please change the draft to this effect. That is a fair point, and a small amount of authoring advice to add attributeType="xml" to avoid inadvertant clashes with future CSS properties seems like a good idea. This might be added in the spec itself, perhaps before CR if we get time, or added in an authoring guidelines document. BH> I note that a better way to address this problem might be to define BH> the value 'auto' in terms of which type is more relevant to the given BH> target, I think that would just generate follow-on comments to define "relevant" and "directly observable behaviour" in great detail. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Monday, 20 March 2006 10:44:52 UTC