Re: SVG12: charmod note

On Monday, March 6, 2006, 6:26:02 PM, Bjoern wrote:

BH> * Chris Lilley wrote:
>>Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>   
>>
>>> Well, you tell me why SVG Tiny 1.2 does not conform to the Character
>>> Model for the World Wide Web 1.0: Fundamentals Recommendation and why
>>> the Working Group failed to formally address my comment to change that
>>> and I'll tell you...
>>
>>Please list the specific lack of conformance that you have in mind.

BH> I would not know what to add to the clarification I've already provided
BH> when asked in response to the comment

So, you have a specific comment in mind. great. Pointer?

BH> the Working Group still has not
BH> formally addressed as far as I can tell.

If I had a pointer I could see whether its been addressed. It  sounds as
if you do, but are unwilling to share it with us. This is rather odd.

BH> Please explain in detail what
BH> is unclear about the conformance requirements, my review comment, and
BH> the clarification I've provided.




-- 
 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
 Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG

Received on Monday, 6 March 2006 17:52:30 UTC