- From: Andrew Shellshear <Andrew.Shellshear@cisra.canon.com.au>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 15:48:47 +1000
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- CC: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
Hi Cameron, Cameron McCormack wrote: >>And it does mean that elements in the 'known elements occurring in >>unexpected locations' still implement their normal interfaces. >> >> > >Are the ‘known elements occurring in unexpected locations’ meant to >implement their normal DOM interfaces still? (I don’t know if you mean >that that is what your suggested tautologous sentence would imply, >correctly or incorrectly, or that that is what is meant to be reflected >in the spec.) If so, perhaps this text is clearer: > > Within an SVG document fragment, any subtree that is rooted by an > unknown element (including those in the SVG or XML Events namespaces) > or a known element that occurs in an unexpected location, is not > rendered. The nodes in the subtree are not processed beyond > including the relevant DOM objects in the document tree. These DOM > objects will still implement the DOM interfaces appropriate for the > element type, however. > > > >>Does that cover your comment? >> >> > >Yes, rewording the existing sentence to say “The rendering for unknown >elements is…” satisfies my comment, but consider some clearer text such >as that suggested above. > > We're using your excellent suggested wording - thanks very much. Andrew.
Received on Friday, 16 June 2006 05:48:58 UTC