- From: Ruud Steltenpool <svg@steltenpower.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:09:19 +0200 (CEST)
- To: "Jean-Claude Moissinac" <moissinac@enst.fr>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org, www-qa@w3.org
SVG 1.1 Full, though that's only in the initialization part of the code. Do you want the code? (It's not the best, but quite readable PHP at the moment) And can you point me to your latest? (I'm especially interested in the w3C spec parsed) Ruud On Wed, July 26, 2006 08:58, Jean-Claude Moissinac wrote: > Your work seems to be useful. > Against which specification are you validating? > SVG 1.0? 1.1 Basic? 1.1 Tiny? 1.1 Full? 1.2 Tiny? > > Jean-Claude Moissinac > > On 7/26/06, Ruud Steltenpool <svg@steltenpower.com> wrote: >> >> >> I hacked together an SVG validator that might, even if only for ideas, >> be >> useful for a future W3C SVG validator improvement. >> >> Next to just telling you what's wrong with your SVG: >> - It tells you about errors induced by inaccurate use of the shift key. >> - It gives some applied advice taken from Jonathan Watt's authoring >> guidelines for cross-viewer SVG content developement >> >> Some serious known current limitations >> - I parsed ZVON's SVG reference and some additions, which is far from >> perfect (I need to learn DTDs and regexp really, but this work has been >> done, right?) >> - attributevalues are only checked when all options are literals >> - all these literals are allowed for every element allowing that >> attribute >> - nothing of the result links to the spec >> >> See >> >> http://steltenpower.com/svgref.php?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dotuscomus.com%2Fsvg%2FSCD_ep2.svg >> for an example >> >> >> Please give me some feedback on this, >> >> Cheers, >> >> Ruud >> http://svg.startpagina.nl >> >> >> > > > -- > -- > Jean-Claude Moissinac > Department of Computer Science and Networks > ENST Paris > FRANCE > > E-mail: moissinac@enst.fr > Tel: (+33) 1.45.81.80.88 > Fax: (+33) 1.45.81.71.58 > > http://shadok.enst.fr/jcm >
Received on Wednesday, 26 July 2006 09:21:47 UTC