- From: Doug Schepers <doug.schepers@vectoreal.com>
- Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 01:14:56 -0400
- To: "'Bjoern Hoehrmann'" <derhoermi@gmx.net>, <www-svg@w3.org>
Hi, Björn- Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: | | The draft uses "run time", "run-time", and "runtime" | "synchronization"; | please stick to one form and apply it consistently. Just to clarify, you're not asking us to change our use of "synchronization", but only the various spellings of "run-time", correct? I will happily do this (I just did the same thing for "white space", "white-space", and "whitespace" ). Is there a preferred term? I am inclined to go with "run time". | The correct term is | "event-base element", not "Eventbase-element". Can you cite your rationale for preferring this variant? SMIL uses many variations, but the place we reference [1] says, "If the Eventbase-element term is missing, the event-base element is defined to be the target element of the animation." I can see it either way, and would be willing to change it if you can find documentation by the SYMM WG supporting your claim. | With these issues fixed, this text addresses my concern. Great. Looking forward to your further clarification so I can effect these changes quickly. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-SMIL2-20051213/animation.html#animationNS-Inte gratingSMILAnimCommon Thanks- Doug, on behalf of the SVG WG
Received on Saturday, 22 July 2006 05:15:07 UTC