- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:50:07 -0500
- To: Erik Dahlström <ed@opera.com>
- CC: www-svg@w3.org
Erik Dahlström wrote: > Ok, so would this wording satisfy you: > "If during parsing a 'script' element is encountered, it must not be > executed at that time. Script execution for that element is deferred until > it is inserted into the contextDoc document." It's better, though it ignores what happens with a null contextDoc and adoptNode followed by insertion into some other document... Probably good enough to get the intent across, at least. > Leftovers from old days I presume, would the following wording be ok: > "NOT_SUPPORTED_ERR: Raised by importNode if the type of node being > imported is not supported." What does importNode have to do with this? Or do you refer to the operation that's "not importNode but acts like it"? The way things are phrased right now sounds like these exceptions need not be thrown if there's no actual importNode involved; is that the desired effect? -Boris
Received on Tuesday, 18 July 2006 16:50:20 UTC