- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 23:20:50 +0100
- To: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
* Robin Berjon wrote: >You make an interesting argument. However it lacks references for its >axioms. Pointers and their accompanied commentary would definitely >help assess whether: > > a) the DOM spec is buggy compared to what was convened with other >WGs, notably but not solely the SVG WG > b) the DOM spec might not be what those WGs wanted, but cannot be >fixed and therefore the fix lies on those WGs' side > c) adding a mention to the uDOM indicating that the DOM parsing is >expected to operate as if 'datatype-normalization" were set to true >would address your concerns (this was considered at some point but >few people saw value in it) > d) the strawman reconciliation concerning the traits that I sent a >few days back is workable for you (and perhaps others, as Anne has >indicated) > e) you're simply wrong (hey, I'm listing *all* options ;) I want the following to hold true: * for attributes and attribute values common to SVG Tiny 1.2 and SVG "Full" 1.2 there is no difference between what constitutes two equivalent attribute values; * implementations are not required to expose the difference between two syntactically different attribute values only if the specifications define that the two values are equivalent; * equivalence of attribute values does not depend on contextual information * equivalence of presentation attribute values is consistent with equivalence of CSS property values And I think we should rather talk about how anything else might be desirable than what might be permissable under some interpretation of vague and incomplete suggestions in DOM Level 3 Core. Regarding d) I'm all for dropping this ingenious "TraitAccess" interface. What you pro- pose in terms of canonicalization is tricky to get right but would make sense regardless of "TraitAccess" interfaces. Whether this would make the best possible interface to the SVG DOM in SVG Tiny 1.2 is not clear to me, but that's out of scope here. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Thursday, 19 January 2006 22:20:30 UTC