- From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:49:07 +0100
- To: thomas.deweese@kodak.com
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
On Jan 12, 2006, at 14:18, thomas.deweese@kodak.com wrote: > This is possible but is not IMHO how the SVG spec is currently > written. > > If the WG wants to adopt your interpretation then I would suggest > making > it clearer that the 'ignore' only applies to the rendering and adding > a fifth bullet to section 'C.2': > > * The UA MAY display a highly visible indication that an > unsupported > element, attribute, property, attribute value or property > value > was > encountered. > > However, given Robin's responses on this topic I doubt the WG would > agree with your interpretation. I don't see what in my reply gives you the impression that we wouldn't accept such a comment. If you feel that the specification is unclear on the fact that content checkers can display highly perceivable indications of all sorts of things (this includes non- conformant content that would not cause a UA to stop, but also perfectly conformant things that are bad ideas as I say in my previous post) then we certainly should add something. -- Robin Berjon Senior Research Scientist Expway, http://expway.com/
Received on Thursday, 12 January 2006 14:53:07 UTC