Re: [SVGMobile12] more on data types

On Jan 12, 2006, at 14:18, thomas.deweese@kodak.com wrote:
>    This is possible but is not IMHO how the SVG spec is currently  
> written.
>
> If the WG wants to adopt your interpretation then I would suggest  
> making
> it clearer that the 'ignore' only applies to the rendering and adding
> a fifth bullet to section 'C.2':
>
>         * The UA MAY display a highly visible indication that an
> unsupported
>           element, attribute, property, attribute value or property  
> value
> was
>           encountered.
>
>    However, given Robin's responses on this topic I doubt the WG would
> agree with your interpretation.

I don't see what in my reply gives you the impression that we  
wouldn't accept such a comment. If you feel that the specification is  
unclear on the fact that content checkers can display highly  
perceivable indications of all sorts of things (this includes non- 
conformant content that would not cause a UA to stop, but also  
perfectly conformant things that are bad ideas as I say in my  
previous post) then we certainly should add something.

-- 
Robin Berjon
    Senior Research Scientist
    Expway, http://expway.com/

Received on Thursday, 12 January 2006 14:53:07 UTC