- From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:44:04 -0000
- To: www-svg@w3.org
"Robin Berjon" <robin.berjon@expway.fr> wrote in message news:3670757E-C2F0-44E4-A776-047C4C8B090C@expway.fr... > Incidentally, the TAG's work on versioning concurs that the MustIgnore > strategy in vocabulary design is sound. It's also in line with strategies > adopted by other WGs for their vocabularies. but not by implementations, most of which attempt to error correct and not ignore, since that behaviour is much better for users, why does the WG feel it necessary to prevent this from happening? Jim.
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2006 14:51:15 UTC