RE: SVG12: illegal non-xlink:href animation targets

> From: Bjoern Hoehrmann [mailto:derhoermi@gmx.net] 
> * Scott Hayman wrote:
> >> This does not define what happens if the target element is not 
> >> capable of being a target of the given animation when the 
> target is 
> >> determined through other means than xlink:href attributes. Please 
> >> change the draft such that this is clarified.
> >
> >We agree - the spec does not adequately address this 
> situation.  I have 
> >moved the part of the sentence that describes what happens if the 
> >target element is not capable of being a target of the given 
> animation 
> >to the first paragraph in that section of the spec.  This way, it 
> >covers all cases where elements are targets for an animation.
> 
> I would rename the section to Identifying the target element 
> for an animation, put "If the xlink:href attribute is not 
> provided, then the target element will be the immediate 
> parent element of the current animation element." below the 
> xlink:href definition and append the text you moved, but well...

Thanks very much for the suggestion.  We will take this editorial
suggestion into consideration.

Regards,
Scott



---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.

Received on Tuesday, 3 January 2006 13:39:14 UTC