- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 00:03:36 +0000 (UTC)
- To: www-svg@w3.org
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Ian Hickson wrote: > > Please change the specification so that serious SVG implementations can > implement the W3C DOM instead, and still claim conformance. > > If there are parts of the SVG DOM that are not an incompatible subset of > the W3C DOM, e.g. the parts of the SVG DOM such as SVGElement, please > define these in a separate appendix so that implementators can clearly > distinguish the parts that they must implement vs the parts that are > redundant with the W3C DOM. In this case, please make such a split > publically available for review before progressing to CR, as this would > be a significant change to the specification. In addition, please make it clear that implementations that include full DOM Level 3 Core and DOM Level 2 Style implementations do not have to implement the "trait" APIs, since they are redundant with the aforementioned specs. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 2 January 2006 00:03:45 UTC