Re: SVG12: 19.4 example

* Chris Lilley wrote:
>BH>   In http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-SVGMobile12-20050413/extend.html
>BH> section 19.4 the example is not SVG Tiny 1.2, please either change
>BH> the example to be a conforming SVG Tiny 1.2 document or include a
>BH> proper discussion as to why SVG 1.1 examples are included.
>
>We agree, fixed. It now says version="1.2"
>
>BH> Further, the example makes weird use of elements in the XHTML namespace
>BH> (e.g., the body of which document is this supposed to be?) Please change
>BH> the draft such that it does not make weird use of elements in the XHTML
>BH> namespace.
>
>We agree that XHTML does not have a definition of a conforming XHTML
>document fragment and people might assume from this example that it
>does.
>
>We have changed the example so it makes weird use of elements that are
>not in the XHTML namespace and do not even look like XHTML elements. It
>should be much clearer that this is an example - the requiredFeatures
>URI and the xmlns are both in example.com, for example.

The example actually uses requiredExtensions which is the appropriate
attribute here; the new example is much better, thanks.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/

Received on Sunday, 1 January 2006 23:33:07 UTC