- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 16:07:23 +0100
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
* Chris Lilley wrote: >We would if we could think of a way to say it. The wording you proposed >introduced other problems. Could you try again? I did not propose any wording, and in order to propose wording I would need to know what the text is trying to convey. I suggest the Working Group should devise a minimal conformance checker for the requirement In all cases, for compliance with the "Namespaces in XML 1.1" Recommendation [XML-NS], an SVG namespace declaration must be in scope for the 'svg' element, so that all SVG elements are identified as belonging to the SVG namespace. In the light of this checker, it should become obvious what text, if any, to use in the draft. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Sunday, 1 January 2006 15:13:40 UTC