W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > August 2006

Re: Assumption in the SVG specifications

From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:19:07 +0200
Message-Id: <58E21B69-4615-4595-B28A-FE65C5261314@expway.fr>
Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
To: jean-claude.dufourd@streamezzo.com

On Aug 31, 2006, at 14:55, Jean-Claude Dufourd wrote:
> Robin Berjon wrote:
>> Don't I recall that this dichotomy, which several of us opposed  
>> but not sufficiently to stop it, was introduced at the behest of  
>> the LASeR group? Maybe someone there remembers what the rationale  
>> was?
> I recall that this request (by implementers, incidentally also from  
> the LASeR group) convinced enough people of its validity that it  
> resisted several opponents. So its merit has clearly outweighted  
> the counter arguments.

I didn't say anything else, and maybe the connection to LASeR was  
incidental (as you know, it was at times unclear what was a liaison  
and what wasn't), I was just wondering if those who backed it  
recalled their arguments? It's been a while and I for one don't.

Robin Berjon
    Senior Research Scientist
    Expway, http://expway.com/
Received on Thursday, 31 August 2006 13:19:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:54:14 UTC