- From: Doug Schepers <doug.schepers@vectoreal.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:13:43 -0400
- To: "'Boris Zbarsky'" <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: "'Chris Lilley'" <chris@w3.org>, <www-svg@w3.org>
Hi, Boris- No apologies necessary, though that's very gacious of you. I totally understand your limited time, and I do appreciate your devoting as much time as you have to reviewing SVG Tiny 1.2. You have raised excellent issues, and my hope is still to resolve them in a way that puts the least burden on implementors (particularly those who are integrating SVG into existing UAs), and is coherent and understandable. We did try very hard to make this processing as straightforward and unsurprising as possible, including testing on existing HTML UAs. If anyone else (Hixie springs to mind) does have a more complete processing model or exhaustive test results about existing script processing models, we would be happy to look at integration of our efforts. I would personally like to see a single script processing model specified for all W3C technologies, insofar as it is possible. Regards- Doug Boris Zbarsky wrote: | | I did some testing and it looks like this particular case is not as | cross-browser compatible as I thought it was; it varies by | particular browser versions and such. :( | | I'm not really in a position in terms of time commitment to | define what parts of the processing model _are_ consistent | amongst HTML UAs, so I'm trusting the | | working group has looked into that as much as they desire to. | | Thanks again, and my apologies, | -Boris |
Received on Friday, 11 August 2006 18:14:03 UTC