W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > August 2006

Re: SVG12: uDOM vs DOMImplementation

From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 19:00:14 +0200
Message-Id: <5BD4CB17-53B7-4668-B236-DF7AE5F3C77D@expway.fr>
Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>

On Jul 22, 2006, at 03:28, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> * Robin Berjon wrote:
>> After careful consideration, given that hasFeature is not broadly
>> used and that introducing it requires further specification work that
>> may cause compatibility problems with the DOM, the WG has decided to
>> pull that feature and any mention of it from SVG Tiny 1.2.
> Could you explain why there now is an empty DOMImplementation inter-
> face?

It provides a convenient location onto which implementations can add  
specific extensions.

Thank you for your comments,

Robin Berjon
    Senior Research Scientist
    Expway, http://expway.com/
Received on Tuesday, 8 August 2006 17:00:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:54:14 UTC