- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 00:13:48 +0200
- To: www-svg@w3.org
- Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Hello www-svg, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote: > Scott Hayman wrote: >>Yes, it is the same in Tiny. As such, the text in Tiny will >>remain as is. We will be sure to cover how this works in Full. > > I see no technical advantage of not making this change, and the SVG > Working Group repeatedly argued it wants to use more general purpose > text in SVG Tiny 1.2 that can also be applied to SVG "Full" 1.2; as > I think the current text is likely to mislead Tiny implementers who > might later want to support additional features not included in Tiny, > I cannot agree with the rejection of my request. In cases where we have suitable text that we are confident covers Full while not being unclear for Tiny, yes, we do prefer to do that. In this case, having after several rounds of revisions worked out text that covers width and height to the satisfaction of a *different* commentor, we didn't want to upset that by making a change here. As you already agreed that the text is correct for Tiny, we can't see why you persist in disagreeing here. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Interaction Domain Leader Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Wednesday, 2 August 2006 22:14:05 UTC