- From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:52:14 +0200
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: www-svg@w3c.org
On Apr 24, 2006, at 23:18, Chris Lilley wrote:
> On Monday, April 24, 2006, 11:05:47 PM, Jonathan wrote:
> JW> Well, that's what the "evt" vs. "event" issue is about - the
> name in the calling
> JW> scope, no?
>
> In which case, why does it need to be standardized?
What needs to be defined is not the name of the parameter for
handleEvent, you could have handleEvent: function (foo) {...} and
it'll work just fine. What we do need is the name of the variable
that's automatically made available to you inside <handler> and event
attributes (since you can't define it yourself).
--
Robin Berjon
Senior Research Scientist
Expway, http://expway.com/
Received on Friday, 28 April 2006 10:52:26 UTC