- From: Nandini Ramani <Nandini.Ramani@Sun.COM>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:54:43 -0700
- To: www-svg@w3.org, ian@hixie.ch
Ian, In response to your comment at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2005Dec/0055.html Quoting from the CSS 2.1 spec: "If a UA does not support a particular value, it should /ignore/ that value when parsing style sheets, as if that value was an illegal value <http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/syndata.html#illegalvalues>. " So, an invalid IRI should be treated as an illegal value, which according to the CSS 2.1 spec should be treated as if it were not specified. So, the SVGT 1.2 honors the CSS rule. The WG disagrees with your proposed solution:: "Please correct the specification so that unsupported values of <paint> have implementable handling, e.g. requiring that unsupported values be treated as 'black'." as this would contradict the CSS 2.1 spec. Thank you -Nandini
Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2006 17:54:34 UTC