- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:58:48 +0200
- To: Andrew Shellshear <Andrew.Shellshear@research.canon.com.au>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org, chris@w3.org, cam@mcc.id.au
* Andrew Shellshear wrote: >>>We have changed the wording >>> >>>"actual trait value is not an SVGRGBColor, i.e. 'none' or a link to a >>>paint server (e.g. to a gradient or a solid-color), this method must..." >>>to >>> >>>"actual trait value is not an SVGRGBColor, i.e. 'none' or a paint server >>>(e.g. a gradient, system paint, or solid-color), this method must..." >> >>I agree with the concerns raised by Chris and Cameron, could >>the relevant sections be changed along the lines they suggest? > >Section 11.14 now says: > >Apart from System Paint, paint servers are referenced using an Local IRI >reference on a 'fill' or 'stroke' property. The concerns raised were relative to the uDOM appendix, not 11.14. I'm not sure this addresses Chris' or Cameron's concerns. As for my comment, I will look at this once the long overdue draft has been published. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2006 15:59:02 UTC