- From: Andrew Shellshear <Andrew.Shellshear@cisra.canon.com.au>
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 16:33:30 +1000
- To: www-svg@w3.org
- CC: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, cam@mcc.id.au
Bjoern wrote: >* Andrew Shellshear wrote: >>Section 11.14 now says: >> >>Apart from System Paint, paint servers are referenced using an Local IRI >>reference on a 'fill' or 'stroke' property. > >The concerns raised were relative to the uDOM appendix, not 11.14. I'm >not sure this addresses Chris' or Cameron's concerns. As for my comment, >I will look at this once the long overdue draft has been published. Well, let's take a look at Chris and Cameron's concerns: Cameron said: >System colours don't seem to be paint servers, as defined in >http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile12/painting.html#PaintServers. Perhaps: > > actual trait value is not an SVGRGBColor, i.e. 'none', a system color > or a paint server (e.g. a gradient or solid color), this method must... (Cameron - thanks, this was an excellent comment, by the way. We *love* it when people give suggested text!) Chris replied: >They are - and in fact we changed the name 'system color' to 'system paint' to reflect this. and then Cameron exposited: >Ok, but in 11.14 it says > > Paint servers are referenced using an IRI reference on a 'fill' or > 'stroke' property. > >which isn't true for system paints. and suddenly things seemed to be coming to a satisfactory, harmonious conclusion... Chris agreed: >Yes, we should change that sentence to clarify that its not the case for system paints. ...and I therefore fixed 11.14. Is there something I've missed? Andrew.
Received on Wednesday, 26 April 2006 06:33:49 UTC