- From: Doug Schepers <doug@schepers.cc>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 03:24:03 -0400
- To: "'Anne van Kesteren'" <fora@annevankesteren.nl>, "'www-svg'" <www-svg@w3.org>
Hi, Anne- | Quoting Doug Schepers <doug@schepers.cc>: | > I think that it is a very realistic view to allow | element-level switching. | > As implementations (for instance, Firefox) grow, they are going to | > have many missing elements. For authors, it is good to allow for | > fallbacks as we have to deal with multiple UAs. | | Perhaps some other kind of fallback mechanism should be used? | (Thinking in lines of fallback as the html:object element | has...) However, it is probably too late to change things now. Hmmmm.... Could you explain? I'm not sure I understand. | > <g requiredFeatures='...Text' requiredFeatures='...Strokes' /> | | This is non well-formed XML. You could have a space separated | list of URIs with the additional requirement that spaces | inside the URIs must be converted to %20 I guess. Yeah, I was playing fast and loose with it. I had originally had them as nested groups, but realized that as soon as the top-level group was accepted, the switch would not go on to its siblings if an inner group failed. Thanks for the correction. Regards- Doug doug . schepers @ vectoreal.com www.vectoreal.com ...for scalable solutions.
Received on Thursday, 29 September 2005 07:24:18 UTC