- From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 09:13:24 +0200
- To: Doug Schepers <doug@schepers.cc>
- Cc: 'Robin Berjon' <robin.berjon@expway.fr>, 'Chris Lilley' <chris@w3.org>, 'www-svg' <www-svg@w3.org>
Quoting Doug Schepers <doug@schepers.cc>: > I think that it is a very realistic view to allow element-level switching. > As implementations (for instance, Firefox) grow, they are going to have many > missing elements. For authors, it is good to allow for fallbacks as we have > to deal with multiple UAs. Perhaps some other kind of fallback mechanism should be used? (Thinking in lines of fallback as the html:object element has...) However, it is probably too late to change things now. > <g requiredFeatures='...Text' requiredFeatures='...Strokes' /> This is non well-formed XML. You could have a space separated list of URIs with the additional requirement that spaces inside the URIs must be converted to %20 I guess. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Thursday, 29 September 2005 07:14:02 UTC