- From: Cameron McCormack <cam-www-svg@aka.mcc.id.au>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 21:15:28 +1100
- To: www-svg@w3.org
Anne van Kesteren:
> So you agree it is underdefined?
I think it's unclear, at least, and should be clarified.
> SVG could say that SVG rendering rules do not apply and that the UA
> should use its default rendering mechanism to render the elements. As
> it happens, that is CSS for every desktop UA.
That's not what Batik does, and I'd consider that a desktop UA.
--
e-mail : cam (at) mcc.id.au icq : 26955922
web : http://mcc.id.au/ msn : cam-msn (at) aka.mcc.id.au
office : +61399055779 jabber : heycam (at) jabber.org
Received on Monday, 31 October 2005 10:25:01 UTC