- From: Cameron McCormack <cam-www-svg@aka.mcc.id.au>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 21:15:28 +1100
- To: www-svg@w3.org
Anne van Kesteren: > So you agree it is underdefined? I think it's unclear, at least, and should be clarified. > SVG could say that SVG rendering rules do not apply and that the UA > should use its default rendering mechanism to render the elements. As > it happens, that is CSS for every desktop UA. That's not what Batik does, and I'd consider that a desktop UA. -- e-mail : cam (at) mcc.id.au icq : 26955922 web : http://mcc.id.au/ msn : cam-msn (at) aka.mcc.id.au office : +61399055779 jabber : heycam (at) jabber.org
Received on Monday, 31 October 2005 10:25:01 UTC